DeepSeek HarnessvsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness and Pi-hole score the same (87/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Pi-hole details →