OrcavsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Orca | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 108 642 | 61 531 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 735 | +487 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 87/100 for Pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; Pi-hole needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 735 stars in 30 days).
Orca details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep Orca, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with