DeepSeek HarnessvsPaddleOCR Local
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | PaddleOCR Local | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 265 481 | 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 489 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 44/100 for PaddleOCR Local, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; PaddleOCR Local needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 489 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →PaddleOCR Local details →