DeepSeek Harnessvsopenvox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | openvox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 264 652 | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 660 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | 9.2.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 53/100 for openvox, so it is the safer default.
openvox ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; openvox needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →openvox details →