DeepSeek HarnessvsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 264 471 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 479 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
OpenMapTiles ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 479 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →OpenMapTiles details →