langflowvsOpenMapTiles
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | OpenMapTiles | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #24 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 156 085 | 3 211 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +894 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v3.16 · 18 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | PLpgSQL |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 65/100 for OpenMapTiles, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OpenMapTiles.
langflow is growing faster right now (+894 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →OpenMapTiles details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep OpenMapTiles, compare it with