DeepSeek HarnessvsOpenELIS Global
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | OpenELIS Global | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 265 570 | 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 578 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 8 |
| Latest release | — | 3.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 54/100 for OpenELIS Global, so it is the safer default.
OpenELIS Global ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 578 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →OpenELIS Global details →