DeepSeek Harnessvsopenclaw-command-center
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | openclaw-command-center | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #110 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 264 775 | 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 783 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.1 · 8 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 48/100 for openclaw-command-center, so it is the safer default.
openclaw-command-center ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-command-center is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 783 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →openclaw-command-center details →All AI Agents projects →