langflowvsopenclaw-command-center
Two self-hosted AI Agents projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | openclaw-command-center | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #110 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 156 117 | 248 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +926 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | v1.4.1 · 8 Mar 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 48/100 for openclaw-command-center, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for openclaw-command-center.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw-command-center is easier to run; langflow needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+926 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →openclaw-command-center details →All AI Agents projects →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep openclaw-command-center, compare it with