DeepSeek HarnessvsMularr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Mularr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 2 in P2P |
| GitHub stars | 265 634 | 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 642 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 45/100 for Mularr, so it is the safer default.
Mularr ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 642 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Mularr details →