DeepSeek HarnessvsLumabri
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | Lumabri | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #5 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 264 716 | 201 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +8 724 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.0 · 12 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 42/100 for Lumabri, so it is the safer default.
Lumabri ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, DeepSeek Harness is easier to run; Lumabri needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →Lumabri details →