DarkMoonvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DarkMoon | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #28 of 78 in Security | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 1 159 | 46 467 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 323 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 57/100 for DarkMoon, so it is the safer default.
DarkMoon ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, mitmproxy is easier to run; DarkMoon needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 323 stars in 30 days).
DarkMoon details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep DarkMoon, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with