corednsvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| coredns | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 399 | 264 906 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +56 | +8 914 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.15.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 76/100 for coredns, so it is the safer default.
coredns ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 914 stars in 30 days).
coredns details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep coredns, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with