DeepSeek Harnessvsdocker-pi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| DeepSeek Harness | docker-pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 87/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 265 053 | 11 728 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +9 061 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+9 061 stars in 30 days).
DeepSeek Harness details →docker-pi-hole details →