ContainerFlowvsdrydock
Two self-hosted Portainer alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ContainerFlow | drydock | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #13 of 44 in Container Management |
| GitHub stars | 192 | 271 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.1.10 · 30 May 2026 | v1.7.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
drydock scores 53/100 against 45/100 for ContainerFlow, so it is the safer default.
ContainerFlow ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for drydock.
ContainerFlow details →drydock details → All Portainer alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep ContainerFlow, compare it with
Keep drydock, compare it with