ContainerFlowvsdoco-cd
Two self-hosted Portainer alternatives, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ContainerFlow | doco-cd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #77 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #11 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 192 | 1 752 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 59 |
| Latest release | v0.1.10 · 30 May 2026 | v0.131.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
doco-cd scores 63/100 against 45/100 for ContainerFlow, so it is the safer default.
doco-cd ships more often: 59 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ContainerFlow.
doco-cd is growing faster right now (+76 stars in 30 days).
ContainerFlow details →doco-cd details → All Portainer alternatives →
Swap a project
Keep ContainerFlow, compare it with
Keep doco-cd, compare it with