Concatvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 12 525 | 93 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 526 | +1 256 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 526 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with