ConcatvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 434 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 435 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 435 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Umbraco CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Umbraco CMS, compare it with