opencutvsUmbraco CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | Umbraco CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #7 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 96 679 | 5 278 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 058 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 27 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | release-13.16.4 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C |
Which one should you pick?
opencut scores 75/100 against 71/100 for Umbraco CMS, so it is the safer default.
Umbraco CMS ships more often: 27 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.
If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; Umbraco CMS needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 058 stars in 30 days).
opencut details →Umbraco CMS details →