ConcatvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 12 498 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 499 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 499 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with