automatic-ripping-machinevsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; automatic-ripping-machine needs more configuration.
automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Text Generation WebUI details →