Concatvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 510 | 114 288 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 511 | +3 540 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
Concat details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with