opencutvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 96 722 | 114 288 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 101 | +3 540 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 8 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 75/100 for opencut, so it is the safer default.
supabase ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.
If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
opencut details →supabase details →