ConcatvsSonatype Nexus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Sonatype Nexus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 454 | 2 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 455 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 30 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 64/100 for Sonatype Nexus, so it is the safer default.
Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Sonatype Nexus needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 455 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Sonatype Nexus details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Sonatype Nexus, compare it with