automatic-ripping-machinevsSonatype Nexus
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Sonatype Nexus | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 392 | 2 689 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 30 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | release-3.97.2-02 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | EPL-1.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
automatic-ripping-machine scores 67/100 against 64/100 for Sonatype Nexus, so it is the safer default.
Sonatype Nexus ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
automatic-ripping-machine is growing faster right now (+148 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Sonatype Nexus details →