ConcatvsSonarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 397 | 17 472 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 398 | +975 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 34 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | C |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 81/100 for Sonarr, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; Sonarr needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 398 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →Sonarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep Sonarr, compare it with