automatic-ripping-machinevsSonarr
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | Sonarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #1 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 17 475 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +978 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 34 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | v5.0.0.2838 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Sonarr scores 81/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
Sonarr ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
Sonarr is growing faster right now (+978 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →Sonarr details →All Media Management projects →