ConcatvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 421 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 422 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 7 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 76/100 for PhotoPrism, so it is the safer default.
PhotoPrism ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; PhotoPrism needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 422 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with