automatic-ripping-machinevsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted Media Management projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 389 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +148 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
automatic-ripping-machine ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
automatic-ripping-machine details →PhotoPrism details →All Media Management projects →