ConcatvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 12 498 | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 499 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Concat scores 82/100 against 75/100 for PeerTube, so it is the safer default.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
Concat is growing faster right now (+2 499 stars in 30 days).
Concat details →PeerTube details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep PeerTube, compare it with