opencutvsPeerTube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| opencut | PeerTube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Video | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 96 705 | 15 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +6 084 | +44 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 13 |
| Latest release | ffmpeg-8.1.3-1 · 24 Sept 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
opencut and PeerTube score the same (75/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
PeerTube ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for opencut.
If you want the quickest setup, opencut is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.
opencut is growing faster right now (+6 084 stars in 30 days).
opencut details →PeerTube details →