Concatvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Concat | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 18 in Video Processing | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 12 434 | 132 679 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 435 | +3 224 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1462 |
| Latest release | v0.2.8 · 20 Oct 2026 | b11976 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 82/100 for Concat, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1462 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Concat.
If you want the quickest setup, Concat is easier to run; llama.cpp needs more configuration.
Concat details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep Concat, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with