automatic-ripping-machinevsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| automatic-ripping-machine | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 142 in Media Management | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 5 391 | 132 699 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +147 | +3 244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 1465 |
| Latest release | 2.24.4 · 3 Oct 2026 | b11979 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 67/100 for automatic-ripping-machine, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1465 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for automatic-ripping-machine.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
automatic-ripping-machine details →llama.cpp details →