CodervsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Coder | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 166 in Developer Tools | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 17 223 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +542 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 72 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.29.24 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Coder scores 76/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Coder ships more often: 72 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Coder is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Coder is growing faster right now (+542 stars in 30 days).
Coder details →Tube Archivist details →