n8nvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| n8n | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 92/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 208 954 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 063 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 205 | 6 |
| Latest release | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
n8n scores 92/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, n8n is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
n8n is growing faster right now (+3 063 stars in 30 days).
n8n details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep n8n, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with