Tube ArchivistvsvLLM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | vLLM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 95 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +3 157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.32.0 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
vLLM scores 91/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
vLLM ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, vLLM is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
vLLM is growing faster right now (+3 157 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →vLLM details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep vLLM, compare it with