GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvsn8n
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 208 914 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +3 105 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 205 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | n8n@3.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
n8n scores 92/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
n8n ships more often: 205 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, n8n is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
n8n is growing faster right now (+3 105 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →n8n details →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep n8n, compare it with