GlassFlow ClickHouse ETLvsdify
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL | dify | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 8 in Data Pipeline | #1 of 7 in AI Workflows |
| GitHub stars | 503 | 159 853 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 727 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 15 |
| Latest release | v3.2.0 · 22 May 2026 | 1.18.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
dify scores 90/100 against 53/100 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, so it is the safer default.
dify ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL.
If you want the quickest setup, dify is easier to run; GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL needs more configuration.
dify is growing faster right now (+2 727 stars in 30 days).
GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL details →dify details →
Swap a project
Keep GlassFlow ClickHouse ETL, compare it with
Keep dify, compare it with