clawboxvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| clawbox | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #96 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 32 | 264 716 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 724 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v4.2.0 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 38/100 for clawbox, so it is the safer default.
clawbox ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 724 stars in 30 days).
clawbox details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep clawbox, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with