ChatGPT Next WebvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ChatGPT Next Web | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in AI Chat | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 88 909 | 264 377 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +103 | +8 385 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 85/100 for ChatGPT Next Web, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, ChatGPT Next Web is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 385 stars in 30 days).
ChatGPT Next Web details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep ChatGPT Next Web, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with