Chinese Webfont ProjectvsHomebox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Chinese Webfont Project | Homebox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #10 of 15 in Asset Management | #1 of 11 in Inventory Management |
| GitHub stars | 1 485 | 7 664 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +295 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 |
| Latest release | — | v0.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Homebox scores 74/100 against 52/100 for Chinese Webfont Project, so it is the safer default.
Homebox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Chinese Webfont Project.
If you want the quickest setup, Homebox is easier to run; Chinese Webfont Project needs more configuration.
Homebox is growing faster right now (+295 stars in 30 days).
Chinese Webfont Project details →Homebox details →
Swap a project
Keep Chinese Webfont Project, compare it with
Keep Homebox, compare it with