chatwootvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| chatwoot | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 84/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 14 in Customer Support | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 38 531 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 370 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 18 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.19.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
chatwoot scores 84/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
chatwoot ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
chatwoot is growing faster right now (+1 370 stars in 30 days).
chatwoot details →Tube Archivist details →