Tube ArchivistvsTypebot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Tube Archivist | Typebot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 8 552 | 10 587 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +83 | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for Typebot, so it is the safer default.
Typebot ships more often: 8 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Typebot is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Typebot is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).
Tube Archivist details →Typebot details →
Swap a project
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with
Keep Typebot, compare it with