parlantvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| parlant | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #22 of 209 in AI Agents | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 18 311 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 5 | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.3.2 · 28 Apr 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
parlant and Tube Archivist score the same (72/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for parlant.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+83 stars in 30 days).
parlant details →Tube Archivist details →