cephvsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ceph | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Distributed Storage | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 17 178 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | C | Go |
Which one should you pick?
ceph scores 78/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ceph.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; ceph needs more configuration.
ceph is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
ceph details →MikroDash details →
Swap a project
Keep ceph, compare it with
Keep MikroDash, compare it with