MikroDashvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MikroDash | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 35 812 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +851 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 28 |
| Latest release | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; SeaweedFS needs more configuration.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+851 stars in 30 days).
MikroDash details →SeaweedFS details →