CasaOSvsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| CasaOS | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 22 in Home Server | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 37 392 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +133 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
CasaOS scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, CasaOS is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
CasaOS is growing faster right now (+133 stars in 30 days).
CasaOS details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →
Swap a project
Keep CasaOS, compare it with
Keep Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, compare it with