nextcloud-aio-mastercontainervsUptime-Kuma-Web-API
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 750 | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +266 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 39 | 0 |
| Latest release | helm-chart-14.4.3 · 29 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer scores 76/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.
nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.
If you want the quickest setup, nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.
nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer is growing faster right now (+266 stars in 30 days).
nextcloud-aio-mastercontainer details →Uptime-Kuma-Web-API details →