Calibre Web Automatedvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Calibre Web Automated | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 6 508 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +172 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 39 |
| Latest release | v4.0.8 · 28 Sept 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Calibre Web Automated scores 73/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Calibre Web Automated.
If you want the quickest setup, Calibre Web Automated is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
Calibre Web Automated is growing faster right now (+172 stars in 30 days).
Calibre Web Automated details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep Calibre Web Automated, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with