binderyvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| bindery | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 19 in Ebook Management | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 543 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 27 | 39 |
| Latest release | v1.46.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
storj scores 61/100 against 56/100 for bindery, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for bindery.
If you want the quickest setup, bindery is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
bindery details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep bindery, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with